Could data save newspapers?01 November 2011 · By Kylie Davis
The news is likely to offend many die hard traditionalists in newsrooms, who are still enraged by the Internet making the word “content” a synonym for journalism. But as obnoxious as it was for purists to contemplate the idea that the poetry of beautiful writing and stunning photography could be belittled by a collective noun, “content” has stretched our perceptions of journalism now. The word has helped us to visualise story telling environments that incorporate rich picture galleries, video, and interactive graphics and information that is both spontaneous and curated. Calling journalism “content” broke an old perception and allowed us to see our product in a different light — the light of our readers and customers (who are now called users, by the way, but we’ll leave that for now). And so, to data. Data is an interesting one. A big one. Bigger than “content” because data could describe not just what we produce, but, if we get smart very quickly, considering that what we do is data could be our new business model. It’s even a model that many media companies have proven themselves to be extremely adept at — Dow Jones, Financial Times, Reuters. And when you look at the phenomenon of Google and Facebook, it’s actually the fuel in their tanks that makes us so jealous. The two online monoliths showed us that data is not just for financial boffins and the big end of town — data packaged in a warm and friendly way can change everyone’s lives. So, “Are you ready for the era of big data?” ask Brad Brown, Michael Chui and James Manyika in the latest McKinsey Quarterly. “Emerging academic research suggests that companies that use data and business analytics to guide decision making are more productive and experience higher returns on equity than competitors that don’t,” the report says. It claims that “networked organisations can gain an edge by opening information conduits internally and by engaging customers and suppliers strategically through Web-based exchanges of information. Over time, we believe big data may well become a new type of corporate asset that will cut across business units and function much as a powerful brand does, representing a basis for competition.” And this is where the idea becomes extremely attractive: data as a brand. Surely companies whose core business is creating stories, photos, images, and video on a 24/7 news cycle — most of it original or a unique understanding of recent events — would know a thing or two about content. But newspaper companies have always had a lackadaisical attitude to data. While companies such as Google and Facebook — and even Flipboard and Welt — make it their business to hoover up information — much of it ours — and regurgitate it in new formats and contexts, newspaper companies have been happy to throw it out each day — turn it into fish and chip wrapper. For us, the excitement has come not from understanding how what we have done could work in new ways so that we could extract additional value, but on the lure of the next story and doing it better all over again tomorrow. We even pay extraordinary amounts to third party organisations to provide industry insights and reports into markets which our reporters cover every single day. That’s a huge irony when you think a lot of the information the consultancies are using has come from our own news pages. When it comes to making business decisions, newspapers are insecure about trusting our own insights, nor do we have the best technology for capturing and analysing what we’ve done. How silly are we? Some newspaper companies — the New York Times, Guardian and Financial Times — have understood that for paywalls to work, they need to have good data collection functioning behind it, harvesting reader details and preferences and allowing the ability to share through social media. But it’s still just the tip of the iceberg. “Companies need to start thinking in earnest about whether they are organised to exploit big data’s potential and to manage the threats it can pose,” the report says. “Success will demand not only new skills but also new perspectives on how the era of big data could evolve — the widening circle of management practices it may affect and the foundation it represents for new, potentially disruptive business models.” McKinsey offers up five areas to consider:
For data to work for newspapers, we will need to open up our organisations, not just to the silos within them but externally. And we will need to start refining how we think of our stories and content not just in terms of words and pictures, but in terms of search. And even then not just from a library clips perspective — which most newspapers execute reasonably — but in our ability to then turn that search into volume and digits that can be crunched and analysed and put into new context by analysts and statisticians who see this kind of information differently from us wordsmiths. But the truly intriguing — and exciting — thing about big data is that it encourages newspaper companies to stop looking externally. The solution to our new business model could be as close as the very thing we produce every single day. They key will be inviting into our organisations the data gurus, analysts and statisticians who don’t necessarily care about the crafting of the words, but who can provide new business perspectives on what we already do very well. Leave a Comment |
About this blog
My name is Kylie Davis, and I'm national real estate editor for News Ltd. in Sydney, Australia, as well as an undergraduate at the AGSM MBA program at the University of New South Wales. I'm passionate about vibrant, creative and entrepreneurial newspapers; about giving oxygen to great journalism; creating connected and engaged communities of readers and advertisers; and smashing down any barriers or closed mindedness that prevents the above. Subscribe Blog archives
April 2012 ( 2 ) Blog roll
Facebook |
3 ways to join INMA: register for an e-newsletter and headlines, become an individual member, or sign up for a corporate membership (unlimited employees) Sign up now
Comments
Scott Stines | Nov 1, 2011 at 8:56 AM
Nigel Newton | Nov 1, 2011 at 10:41 AM
Dorrine | Nov 1, 2011 at 5:57 PM
Kylie | Nov 1, 2011 at 6:58 PM
Frans Toruswa | Nov 2, 2011 at 2:15 AM
Kylie | Nov 2, 2011 at 11:43 PM
Pete Forde | Nov 3, 2011 at 2:26 AM
My perspective is both that of a reader and a data start-up founder. We are building BuzzData to be a place where anyone (people or organizations) can publish data to anyone (we mean it — hackers right on down to non-technical users) that is interested.
Now, when I say interested in data I am not assuming that you are excited to spend hours staring at spreadsheets or running statistics. Instead, when someone uploads data they become the curator of that data. And when someone is interested in that data and arrives via a link from a blog post, search engine or news aggregator, they are first introduced to the narrative that informs that data and the community of people that are excited about it. We're not making the assumption that you want to stare at rows and columns.
Unsurprisingly, journalists are really excited about what we're doing. I'd welcome comments, questions or suggestions from anyone here about BuzzData. Please come and say hi!
http://eaves.ca/2011/08/03/open-source-data-journalism-–-happening-now-at-buzz-data/
http://radar.oreilly.com/2011/09/buzzdata-data-community.html
http://blogs.montrealgazette.com/2011/10/28/hysteria-over-gun-registry-data/
Pete
CTO & Co-Founder of BuzzData
Kylie | Nov 3, 2011 at 7:28 PM
Pete Forde | Nov 4, 2011 at 2:39 AM
We'd love to talk more about working with you. Could you drop me an email at pete at buzzdata dot com?
Pete