Out of the Box Blog

Out of the Box

Could data save newspapers?

01 November 2011 · By Kylie Davis

The world is entering a new era of “Big Data” according to a new McKinsey report which claims that businesses that can get their heads around how to harness the constant flow of information are winning the race of profit and competition.

The news is likely to offend many die hard traditionalists in newsrooms, who are still enraged by the Internet making the word “content” a synonym for journalism. But as obnoxious as it was for purists to contemplate the idea that the poetry of beautiful writing and stunning photography could be belittled by a collective noun, “content” has stretched our perceptions of journalism now. The word has helped us to visualise story telling environments that incorporate rich picture galleries, video, and interactive graphics and information that is both spontaneous and curated. Calling journalism “content” broke an old perception and allowed us to see our product in a different light — the light of our readers and customers (who are now called users, by the way, but we’ll leave that for now).

And so, to data. Data is an interesting one. A big one. Bigger than “content” because data could describe not just what we produce, but, if we get smart very quickly, considering that what we do is data could be our new business model.

It’s even a model that many media companies have proven themselves to be extremely adept at — Dow Jones, Financial Times, Reuters. And when you look at the phenomenon of Google and Facebook, it’s actually the fuel in their tanks that makes us so jealous. The two online monoliths showed us that data is not just for financial boffins and the big end of town — data packaged in a warm and friendly way can change everyone’s lives.

So, “Are you ready for the era of big data?” ask Brad Brown, Michael Chui and James Manyika in the latest McKinsey Quarterly.

“Emerging academic research suggests that companies that use data and business analytics to guide decision making are more productive and experience higher returns on equity than competitors that don’t,” the report says.

It claims that “networked organisations can gain an edge by opening information conduits internally and by engaging customers and suppliers strategically through Web-based exchanges of information. Over time, we believe big data may well become a new type of corporate asset that will cut across business units and function much as a powerful brand does, representing a basis for competition.”

And this is where the idea becomes extremely attractive: data as a brand. Surely companies whose core business is creating stories, photos, images, and video on a 24/7 news cycle — most of it original or a unique understanding of recent events — would know a thing or two about content.

But newspaper companies have always had a lackadaisical attitude to data. While companies such as Google and Facebook — and even Flipboard and Welt — make it their business to hoover up information — much of it ours — and regurgitate it in new formats and contexts, newspaper companies have been happy to throw it out each day — turn it into fish and chip wrapper. For us, the excitement has come not from understanding how what we have done could work in new ways so that we could extract additional value, but on the lure of the next story and doing it better all over again tomorrow.

We even pay extraordinary amounts to third party organisations to provide industry insights and reports into markets which our reporters cover every single day. That’s a huge irony when you think a lot of the information the consultancies are using has come from our own news pages. When it comes to making business decisions, newspapers are insecure about trusting our own insights, nor do we have the best technology for capturing and analysing what we’ve done.

How silly are we?

Some newspaper companies — the New York Times, Guardian and Financial Times — have understood that for paywalls to work, they need to have good data collection functioning behind it, harvesting reader details and preferences and allowing the ability to share through social media. But it’s still just the tip of the iceberg.

“Companies need to start thinking in earnest about whether they are organised to exploit big data’s potential and to manage the threats it can pose,” the report says. “Success will demand not only new skills but also new perspectives on how the era of big data could evolve — the widening circle of management practices it may affect and the foundation it represents for new, potentially disruptive business models.”

McKinsey offers up five areas to consider:

  1. Data is no longer proprietary. Rather, it is undergoing “radical transparency.” Consider the implications for your business.

  2. Big data allows you test all your decisions and conduct experiments. Consider how that could change the way you compete.

  3. Big data allows widespread, real-time customisation. Could this be a game changer in your business? The answer for newspapers is clearly ‘yes’ on this. We’re seeing the impact of it already.

  4. Big data can augment or even replace management, or some managerial decisions. (Bring it!)

  5. New business models are being built on data.

For data to work for newspapers, we will need to open up our organisations, not just to the silos within them but externally. And we will need to start refining how we think of our stories and content not just in terms of words and pictures, but in terms of search. And even then not just from a library clips perspective — which most newspapers execute reasonably — but in our ability to then turn that search into volume and digits that can be crunched and analysed and put into new context by analysts and statisticians who see this kind of information differently from us wordsmiths.

But the truly intriguing — and exciting — thing about big data is that it encourages newspaper companies to stop looking externally. The solution to our new business model could be as close as the very thing we produce every single day. They key will be inviting into our organisations the data gurus, analysts and statisticians who don’t necessarily care about the crafting of the words, but who can provide new business perspectives on what we already do very well.

print article send to friend



Comments

Scott Stines | Nov 1, 2011 at 8:56 AM

This has been true for sometime, but important to remember that data becomes information when it is related to the way we do business and information becomes knowledge only when we use it to change the way we make decisions do business. The more you know, the farther you go!



Nigel Newton | Nov 1, 2011 at 10:41 AM

Data needs to be collected from what we have in hand and the insights used to make informed business decisions. Newspapers have a long history of identifying news and publishing it for the readership. In the digital era of newspapers those producing the content are now accountable for engaging an audience and there are the means available to measure the engagement. Embrace the accountability and measurement and the role of data will come into its own.



Dorrine | Nov 1, 2011 at 5:57 PM

Can you give examples? I'm not sure I completely understand the ways in which you are suggesting data be "put into new contexts."



Kylie | Nov 1, 2011 at 6:58 PM

Hi Dorrine. In my area, real estate, we publish home prices and price movements all the time. But it's one off currently. But tie price movements with suburb information (which we also publish in story form) and crime statistics, and school information and make sure that you're collecting that in a database rather than just printing it and suddenly you have both a rich new source for telling stories, and you have something very valuable.



Frans Toruswa | Nov 2, 2011 at 2:15 AM

Speaking about data in the newspaper world,I don't think all about data is new anymore. We've known already what the precision journalism does in making stories, in relation with big data that come from primary and secondary data, and other field such as Geography Information System (GIS)or photos that have been taken from satellites. Yes, we cannot barely print them in the paper, we have to crunch and analyse them, and serve them in the sense of story telling journalistic style. The point is, journalism nowadays is more complex than the traditional one. The push factor is the market itself, with information technology as the main leverage.



Kylie | Nov 2, 2011 at 11:43 PM

That's a great point Frans. It's the ability of journalists to tell story about data that really gives us an edge and makes it interesting - not just raw figures. That then inspires new questions and the data gets interrogated further and the cycle goes on. The page design and layout skills at our disposal also mean we have good insights into the way people consume information which many data engineers do not have!



Pete Forde | Nov 3, 2011 at 2:26 AM

Great piece, Kylie!

My perspective is both that of a reader and a data start-up founder. We are building BuzzData to be a place where anyone (people or organizations) can publish data to anyone (we mean it — hackers right on down to non-technical users) that is interested.

Now, when I say interested in data I am not assuming that you are excited to spend hours staring at spreadsheets or running statistics. Instead, when someone uploads data they become the curator of that data. And when someone is interested in that data and arrives via a link from a blog post, search engine or news aggregator, they are first introduced to the narrative that informs that data and the community of people that are excited about it. We're not making the assumption that you want to stare at rows and columns.

Unsurprisingly, journalists are really excited about what we're doing. I'd welcome comments, questions or suggestions from anyone here about BuzzData. Please come and say hi!

http://eaves.ca/2011/08/03/open-source-data-journalism-–-happening-now-at-buzz-data/

http://radar.oreilly.com/2011/09/buzzdata-data-community.html

http://blogs.montrealgazette.com/2011/10/28/hysteria-over-gun-registry-data/

Pete
CTO & Co-Founder of BuzzData



Kylie | Nov 3, 2011 at 7:28 PM

I've checked out Buzz Data pieces Pete. They're really interesting and exactly what I'm talking about. Keep me posted on how you progress, or if we could do a project together.



Pete Forde | Nov 4, 2011 at 2:39 AM

Hey Kylie,

We'd love to talk more about working with you. Could you drop me an email at pete at buzzdata dot com?

Pete



Leave a Comment

(will not be displayed)

Leave this field empty:

About this blog

My name is Kylie Davis, and I'm national real estate editor for News Ltd. in Sydney, Australia, as well as an undergraduate at the AGSM MBA program at the University of New South Wales. I'm passionate about vibrant, creative and entrepreneurial newspapers; about giving oxygen to great journalism; creating connected and engaged communities of readers and advertisers; and smashing down any barriers or closed mindedness that prevents the above.


Subscribe

RSS feed
E-newsletter


Blog archives

April 2012 ( 2 )
February 2012 ( 1 )
January 2012 ( 1 )
December 2011 ( 1 )
November 2011 ( 2 )
October 2011 ( 1 )
September 2011 ( 1 )
August 2011 ( 1 )
July 2011 ( 1 )
June 2011 ( 1 )
May 2011 ( 1 )
April 2011 ( 1 )
March 2011 ( 1 )
February 2011 ( 1 )
January 2011 ( 1 )
December 2010 ( 1 )
November 2010 ( 1 )
October 2010 ( 1 )
September 2010 ( 2 )
August 2010 ( 1 )


Blog roll

Facebook
Laurel Papworth
Mumbrella
PANPA
Trend Watching


Join INMA Today

Join INMA Today

3 ways to join INMA: register for an e-newsletter and headlines, become an individual member, or sign up for a corporate membership (unlimited employees) Sign up now

 


©2012 INMA | Home | About | Contact | RSS | Privacy